PS3-Hacks.com / Call of Duty®: World at War

Pooky_187 · 2008-12-18 03:13:31

http://www.gamestop.com/common/images/lbox/270274b.jpg

Graphics- Pretty good, feels like WW2 so the lack of spectacualr graphics fits it.

Sound- Excelent, you hear gunfire going by & the sound of your flame thrower as screams of someone burning by it is fun.

Controls- Excelent- familliar FPS controls.

Gameplay- fun yet short & gets hard on higher modes such as Veteran cause enimies keep spawning at points untill you cross a invisible check point so you tend to feel cheated after killing 100's of guys & they dont stop plus your own AI controlled team mates are not very bright.

Online- Has its bugs & people in Tanks Spawn killing SUCK! LOOSERS! Other than that it is fun as long as teams are evened out & you dont have a bunch of glitchers & spawn killers. maps still need to be bigger like Battlefield.

Overall- 7/10 (Single Player)
Online- 4/10

*Has Trophies

*** Online is complete garbage - maps are to small & its to easy to get spawn killed even accidently!

Last edited by Pooky_187 (2009-02-20 23:52:19)

JoN- · 2008-12-18 18:21:31

getting it for christmas
loved cod4, hopefully will love this aswell

ERIFNOMI · 2008-12-18 18:50:13

I think it may be a let down if you're going to compare it to CoD4

Sk8yu · 2009-01-07 01:29:59

ughh it was disappointing nothing really like c0d4 same concept but totally different feel ....
im with pooky 8/10

maybe because infinity ward wasn't apart of this one

Powerslave · 2009-01-07 10:24:47

The Xb360 version graphics are better. I had the on-line beta, and it was better than the PS3 version. I hope this wasn't a port, but it seems the case. One of my wife's kids, who is now 18 and working, said he was buying me this for Xmas, well, what day is it now???

Gat305 · 2009-01-07 11:46:54

Powerslave wrote:
The Xb360 version graphics are better. I had the on-line beta, and it was better than the PS3 version. I hope this wasn't a port, but it seems the case. One of my wife's kids, who is now 18 and working, said he was buying me this for Xmas, well, what day is it now???

No the wii version is better... lol

warner_v · 2009-01-07 13:25:11

Gat305 wrote:
Powerslave wrote:
The Xb360 version graphics are better. I had the on-line beta, and it was better than the PS3 version. I hope this wasn't a port, but it seems the case. One of my wife's kids, who is now 18 and working, said he was buying me this for Xmas, well, what day is it now???
No the wii version is better... lol

no you are both wrong the ps2 version is better hahahaha.

ERIFNOMI · 2009-01-07 17:31:02

warner_v wrote:
Gat305 wrote:
Powerslave wrote:
The Xb360 version graphics are better. I had the on-line beta, and it was better than the PS3 version. I hope this wasn't a port, but it seems the case. One of my wife's kids, who is now 18 and working, said he was buying me this for Xmas, well, what day is it now???
No the wii version is better... lol
no you are both wrong the ps2 version is better hahahaha.

PS2 version can't be much worse than the Wii.

Pooky_187 · 2009-02-20 23:53:22

i have changed my review score from a 8 to 7. Plus i rated online as its own rank since online is garbage where single player isn't bad

Ps3-Reviewer · 2009-05-02 12:35:13

Best game ever, you should definitely buy it is my favorite game currently and has unique features that were not in part 4

#1 2008-12-18 03:13:31

Call of Duty®: World at War

#2 2008-12-18 18:21:31

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

#3 2008-12-18 18:50:13

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

#4 2009-01-07 01:29:59

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

#5 2009-01-07 10:24:47

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

#6 2009-01-07 11:46:54

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

Powerslave wrote:

#7 2009-01-07 13:25:11

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

Gat305 wrote:

Powerslave wrote:

#8 2009-01-07 17:31:02

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

warner_v wrote:

Gat305 wrote:

Powerslave wrote:

#9 2009-02-20 23:53:22

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

#10 2009-05-02 12:35:13

Re: Call of Duty®: World at War

Board footer